Performance
Architecture debt slowing every release
Systems not designed to evolve become bottlenecks. Every new feature requires weeks of untangling rather than days of building.
40%
visitors lost at 3s+
We design scalable, maintainable system architectures that grow with your product from microservices and event-driven systems to API design and database architecture.
50+ systems architected | Microservices, Event-Driven, API-First Design
Projects shipped
Clients worldwide
Satisfaction
Avg Response
WHY CODEFLAMME
RESPONSE TIME
<24h
We reply to every inquiry within one business day with a structured plan.
Problems We Solve
Legacy platforms, scaling bottlenecks, and one-size-fits-all tools — we see these patterns every week.
Performance
Systems not designed to evolve become bottlenecks. Every new feature requires weeks of untangling rather than days of building.
40%
visitors lost at 3s+
Architecture
Architecture decisions made for an early-stage product frequently become the biggest barrier to growth at scale.
3×
rebuild cost at scale
Fit
When architecture only exists in the heads of the original engineers, every team change becomes a knowledge crisis.
0%
workflow match
WHY CODEFLAMME
We know the hesitation. Here's exactly how we're different.
No account managers relaying messages. You're in direct contact with the founder and senior engineers on your project — every sprint, every decision.
The team that scopes your project is the team that ships it. We don't swap engineers mid-project to free them up for someone else.
Your idea and IP are protected from the first real conversation — not after contracts are signed.
Every line of code, every design file, transfers to you on delivery. No licensing, no retained rights, no surprises.
Our Approach
We approach architecture as a living discipline, not a one-time deliverable. We begin with your business constraints — team size, expected load, compliance requirements, and budget — and design the simplest architecture that meets them. We use Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document every significant decision and the trade-offs considered, creating a permanent record for your engineering team.
Engagements start with constraint mapping and a structured review of what exists (or a greenfield threat model of what you plan to build). We pressure-test load, failure modes, data ownership, and operational cost before recommending service boundaries. Deliverables are concrete: C4 diagrams, sequence flows for critical paths, data-store choices tied to access patterns, and ADRs that capture why alternatives were rejected. Where a monolith is healthy, we keep it. Where extraction is needed, we propose a phased strangler path with clear seams — never a speculative microservices sprawl that your team cannot operate. The goal is an architecture your engineers understand and can evolve without us in the room.
Capabilities
Reviews, service boundaries, data and caching strategy, ADRs, and capacity planning — architecture your team can operate.
Structured review of existing systems identifying bottlenecks, risks, single points of failure, and refactoring opportunities.
Decomposing monolithic applications into independently deployable services with proper domain boundaries and inter-service communication patterns.
Designing asynchronous, event-driven systems using message queues and event streams for high-throughput, loosely coupled architectures.
Designing API contracts before implementation — OpenAPI specification, versioning strategy, and consumer-driven contract testing.
Selecting and designing the right data storage strategy — relational, document, graph, time-series — for your access patterns.
Designing caching layers at the right level — CDN, application, database — to reduce latency and infrastructure cost.
Creating and maintaining Architecture Decision Records, system diagrams, and runbooks for your engineering team.
Modelling expected load, growth, and failure scenarios to validate that the proposed architecture can meet your requirements.
Architecture Focus
Constraint-led design, ADRs, simplest viable topology, and phased evolution — not buzzword diagrams from a slide consultancy.
Team size, compliance, latency budgets, and ops maturity drive the design. We do not prescribe Kafka-and-twelve-services because a blog post did — we prescribe what you can run Monday morning.
Every significant choice gets a short record: context, decision, alternatives, consequences. New hires and future you understand why the system looks the way it does without archaeological Slack searches.
Monolith, modular monolith, or selective services — chosen deliberately. Over-engineering is treated as debt: complexity you pay for in onboarding, incident response, and coordination cost.
When change is required, we map strangler seams, dual-write windows, and rollback criteria. You get a sequence of shippable steps — not a multi-year rewrite proposal that never starts.
Technology Stack
Distributed systems architecture — databases, messaging, and cloud patterns that scale cleanly.
LAYERS
04
TOOLS
20
FAQ
Can't find what you need? Talk directly with our team.
Book a Discovery CallAs early as possible — ideally before significant development begins. The cost of fixing architecture problems grows exponentially with the amount of code built on top of them.
Tell us what you are building. We will respond within 24 hours with a clear, honest assessment — no pressure, no sales pitch.
NDA protected · Reply within 24 hours · No commitment required